A settlement being discussed in an antitrust lawsuit against the NCAA and major college conferences could cost billions and pave the way for a compensation model for college athletes.
An agreement has not been finalized and many questions remain unanswered. It is also unclear if new rules could withstand further legal scrutiny, but it appears college sports is heading down a revolutionary path with at least some schools directly paying athletes to participate. Here’s what is known and what still needs to be figured out:
House vs. NCAA is a class-action federal lawsuit seeking damages for athletes who were denied the opportunity to earn money from use of their name, image or likeness going back to 2016. The plaintiffs, including former Arizona State swimmer Grant House, are also asking the court to rule that NIL compensation should include billions of dollars in media rights fees that go to the NCAA and the wealthiest conferences (Big Ten, Big 12, Atlantic Coast and Southeastern), mostly for football and basketball.
Related articles:
Related suggestion:
Madrid replacements too good for Sociedad and take step closer to La Liga titleNutritionists reveal the best FOODS to eat if you want to eradicate acne and get glowing skinHere are 14 players to watch next season across the Southeastern ConferenceA man accused in a Harvard bomb threat and extortion plot is sentenced to 3 years probationHere are 14 players to watch next season across the Southeastern ConferenceKing Charles III to resume public duties after cancer treatmentChicago appeals court rejects R. Kelly 's challenge of 20Defending champion Sabalenka advances at Madrid Open with a 3Oceanside Pier in San Diego is consumed by huge fire, forcing visitors to evacuate 1954Maine govenor signs off on new gun laws, mental health supports in wake of Lewiston shootings
0.1633s , 4868.359375 kb
Copyright © 2024 Powered by Paying college athletes appears closer than ever. How could it work and what stands in the way? ,Global Glimpse news portal